钆塞酸二钠增强磁共振成像检查术前诊断粗梁‑团块型肝细胞肝癌的临床价值

Clinical value of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylanetriaminepentaacetic acid enhanced MRI in the preoperative diagnosis of macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular carcinoma

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨钆塞酸二钠(Gd‑EOB‑DTPA)增强磁共振成像(MRI)检查术前诊断粗梁‑团块型肝细胞肝癌(MTM‑HCC)的临床价值。
    方法 采用诊断性试验方法。收集2019年1月至2020年12月陆军军医大学第一附属医院收治的150例肝细胞肝癌病人的临床病理资料;男116例,女34例;年龄为(53±10)岁。150例病人中,38例MTM‑HCC,112例非粗梁‑团块型肝细胞肝癌(nMTM‑HCC)。病人均行Gd‑EOB‑DTPA增强MRI检查。观察指标:(1)MTM‑HCC和nMTM‑HCC的临床病理特征。(2)MTM‑HCC和nMTM‑HCC的影像学特征。(3)诊断MTM‑HCC相关的影像学特征。连续变量的正态性检验采用Kolmogorov‑Smirnov检验。正态分布且方差齐性计量资料以x±s表示,组间比较采用独立样本t检验。偏态分布的计量资料以MP25,P75)表示,组间比较采用Mann‑Whitney U检验。计数资料以绝对数表示,组间比较采用χ²检验。多因素分析采用Logistic回归模型。通过绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)评价指标诊断价值,并应用Delong检验进行比较。
    结果 (1)MTM‑HCC和nMTM‑HCC的临床病理特征:MTM‑HCC病人甲胎蛋白和微血管侵犯分别为329 μg/L(20 μg/L,1 034 μg/L)和24例,nMTM‑HCC上述指标分别为25 μg/L(8 μg/L,200 μg/L)和31例,两者上述指标比较,差异均有统计学意义(Z=-3.306,χ²=15.380,P<0.05)。(2)MTM‑HCC和nMTM‑HCC的影像学特征:MTM‑HCC病人肿瘤形态规则、瘤内脂肪、动脉期瘤周异常强化、包膜完整、瘤内坏死或缺血、肝胆期瘤周低信号分别为6、4、20、5、28、17例,nMTM‑HCC上述指标分别为44、40、21、43、26、11例,两者上述指标比较,差异均有统计学意义(χ²=7.049、8.684、16.399、8.303、31.368、22.783,P<0.05)。(3)诊断MTM‑HCC相关的影像学特征:①多因素分析结果显示瘤内脂肪、瘤内坏死或缺血是诊断MTM‑HCC的独立影响因素(风险比=4.033、0.215,95%可信区间为1.196~13.603、0.079~0.588,P<0.05)。②诊断效能:瘤内脂肪、瘤内坏死或缺血联合诊断MTM‑HCC的ROC曲线下面积、灵敏度、特异度分别为0.799(95%可信区间为0.718~0.880,P<0.05)、73.7%、76.8%;瘤内脂肪上述指标分别为0.626(95%可信区间为0.530~0.721,P<0.05)、89.5%、35.7%;瘤内坏死或缺血上述指标分别为0.752(95%可信区间为0.659~0.845,P<0.05)、73.7%、76.8%。Delong检验瘤内脂肪、瘤内坏死或缺血联合诊断MTM‑HCC效能分别与瘤内脂肪、瘤内坏死或缺血比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
    结论 Gd‑EOB‑DTPA增强MRI检查中瘤内脂肪和瘤内坏死或缺血是诊断MTM‑HCC的独立影响因素,两者联合诊断效能更高,可术前鉴别诊断MTM‑HCC和nMTM‑HCC。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the clinical value of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethy-lanetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the preoperative diagnosis of macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular carcinoma (MTM-HCC).
    Methods The diagnostic test was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 150 HCC patients who were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University from January 2019 to December 2020 were collected. There were 116 males and 34 females, aged (53±10)years. There were 38 MTM-HCC patients and 112 non-macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular carcinoma (nMTM-HCC) patients. All patients received Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI examination. Observation indicators: (1) clinicopathological features of MTM-HCC and nMTM-HCC; (2) imaging features of MTM-HCC and nMTM-HCC; (3) imaging features for diagnosis of MTM-HCC. The normality test of continuous data was analyzed by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Measurement data with normal distribution and homoscedasticity were represented as Mean±SD, and comparison between groups was analyzed using the independent sample t test. Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M(P25,P75), and comparison between groups was analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test. Count data were described as absolute numbers, and comparison between groups was analyzed using the chi-square test. Multivariate analysis was conducted using the Logistic regression model. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate diagnostic value of indicators, and Delong test was used for comparison.
    Results (1) Clinicopathological features of MTM-HCC and nMTM-HCC: the alpha-fetoprotein and cases with microvascular invasion were 329 μg/L(20 μg/L,1 034 μg/L) and 24 for MTM-HCC patients, versus 25 μg/L(8 μg/L,200 μg/L) and 31 for nMTM-HCC patients, showing significant differences between the two groups (Z=-3.306, χ2=15.380, P<0.05). (2) Imaging features of MTM-HCC and nMTM-HCC: cases with regular morphology of tumor, intra-tumoral fat, arterial phase peritumoral enhancement, complete capsule, intratumoral necrosis or ischemia, peritumoral hypointense at hepatobiliary phase (HBP) were 6, 4, 20, 5, 28, 17 for MTM-HCC patients, versus 44, 40, 21, 43, 26, 11 for nMTM-HCC patients, showing significant differences between the two groups (χ2=7.049, 8.684, 16.399, 8.303, 31.368, 22.783, P<0.05). (3) Imaging features for diagnosis of MTM-HCC. ① Results of multivariate analysis showed that intratumoral fat, intratumoral necrosis or ischemia were independent predictors for MTM-HCC (hazard ratio=4.033,0.215, 95% confidence interval as 1.196-13.603, 0.079-0.588, P<0.05). ② Diagnostic efficacy: the arear under ROC curve, sensitivity and specificity of intratumoral fat combined with intratumoral necrosis or ischemia for diagnosis of MTM-HCC were 0.799(95% confidence interval as 0.718-0.880, P<0.05), 73.7%, 76.8%. The above indicators of intratumoral fat for diagnosis of MTM-HCC were 0.626(95% confidence interval as 0.530-0.721, P<0.05), 89.5%, 35.7%. The above indicators of intratumoral necrosis or ischemia for diagnosis of MTM-HCC were 0.752(95% confidence interval as 0.659-0.845, P<0.05), 73.7%, 76.8%. There were significant differences in the diagnostic efficacy between the intratumoral fat combined with intratumoral necrosis or ischemia and single intratumoral fat, between the intratumoral fat combined with intratumoral necrosis or ischemia and single intratumoral necrosis or ischemia, respectively (P<0.05).
    Conclusions Intratumoral fat, intratumoral necrosis or ischemia on Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI are independent predictors for MTM-HCC. The two combined features has higher diagnostic efficacy. Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI can be used for pre-operative diagnosis of MTM-HCC.

     

/

返回文章
返回