纳米炭示踪剂不同注射方法对胃癌全胃切除术中淋巴结检出数目的影响

Effects of different injection methods of carbon nanoparticle tracer on the acquisition of lymph nodes in total gastrectomy for gastric cancer

  • 摘要: 目的:探讨术前内镜下黏膜注射纳米炭示踪剂和术中浆膜下注射纳米炭示踪剂对胃癌全胃切除术中淋巴结检出数目的影响。
    方法:采用回顾性队列研究方法。收集2017年5月至2018年4月郑州大学附属肿瘤医院收治118例行全胃切除术胃癌患者的临床病理资料;男79例,女39例;平均年龄为59岁,年龄范围为26~81岁。118例患者中,56例术前内镜下黏膜注射纳米炭示踪剂,设为观察组;62例术中浆膜下注射纳米炭示踪剂,设为对照组。观察指标:总淋巴结清扫数目、阳性淋巴结清扫数目、第一站淋巴结清扫数目以及第二站淋巴结清扫数目。正态分布的计量资料以±s表示,组间比较采用独立样本 t检验;偏态分布的计量资料以M(范围)表示,组间比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验;计数资料以绝对数表示,组间比较采用x2检验或Fisher确切概率法;等级资料比较采用秩和检验。
    结果:观察组患者总淋巴结清扫数目、阳性淋巴结清扫数目、第一站淋巴结清扫数目、第二站淋巴结清扫数目分别为(48±16)枚、3枚(0~25枚)、(26±9)枚、(23±7)枚;对照组患者上述指标分别为(41±13)枚、4枚(0~28枚)、(25±8)枚、 (16±5)枚。两组患者总淋巴结清扫数目、第二站淋巴结清扫数目比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=2.494,6.588,P<0.05),两组患者阳性淋巴结清扫数目、第一站淋巴结清扫数目比较,差异均无统计学意义(Z=0.747,t=1.689,P>0.05)。
    结论:胃癌全胃切除术前内镜下黏膜注射纳米炭示踪剂和术中浆膜下注射纳米炭示踪剂均为安全、有效的淋巴结示踪剂注射方法。术前内镜下黏膜注射纳米炭示踪剂较术中浆膜下注射纳米炭示踪剂能提高胃癌淋巴结清扫数目,尤其是第二站淋巴结清扫数目。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To investigate the effects of preoperative endoscopic mucosal injection of carbon nanoparticle tracer and intraoperative serosa injection of carbon nanoparticle tracer on the acquisition of lymph nodes in total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
    Methods:The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinical data of 118 patients with gastric cancer who underwent total gastrectomy in the Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Zhengzhou University between May 2017 and April 2018 were collected. There were 79 males and 39 females, aged from 26 to 81 years, with an average age of 59 years. Of 118 patients, 56 patients undergoing preoperative endoscopic mucosal injection of carbon nanoparticle tracer were divided into observation group and 62 patients undergoing intraoperative serosa injection of carbon nanoparticle tracer were divided into control group. Observation indicators: the total number of lymph node dissected, the number of positive lymph node dissected, the number of lymph node dissected at the first station and the number of lymph node dissected at the second station. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean±SD, and comparison between groups was analyzed using the independent-sample t test. Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M (range), and comparison between groups was analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Count data were described as absolute numbers, and comparison between groups was analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability. Comparison of ordinal data was analyzed using the rank sum test.
    Results:The total number of lymph node dissected, the number of positive lymph node dissected, the number of lymph node dissected at the first station, the number of lymph node dissected at the second station of the observation group were 48±16, 3(range, 0-25), 26±9, 23±7, respectively. The above indicators of the control group were 41±13, 4(range, 0-28), 25±8, 16±5, respectively. There were significant differences in the total number of lymph node dissected and the number of lymph node dissected at the second station between the two groups (t=2.494, 6.588, P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the number of positive lymph node dissected and the number of lymph node dissected at the first station between the two groups (Z=0.747, t=1.689, P>0.05).
    Conclusions:Carbon nanoparticle labeled lymph node staining using preoperative endoscopic mucosal injection of carbon nanoparticle tracer or intraoperative serosa injection of carbon nanoparticle tracer is safe and effective in total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Compared with intraoperative serosa injection of carbon nanoparticle tracer, preoperative endoscopic mucosal injection of carbon nanoparticle tracer can increase the total number of lymph node dissected, especially the number of lymph node dissected at the second station of gastric cancer.

     

/

返回文章
返回