人工神经网络在腹腔镜操作培训中的应用价值

Application value of artificial neural network in laparoscopic surgery training

  • 摘要: 目的:探讨人工神经网络在腹腔镜操作培训中的应用价值。
    方法:采用前瞻性队列研究方法。选取2019年9—11月陆军军医大学第一附属医院158名腹腔镜零基础学员(2019级、2018级、2017级外科硕士研究生52名,外科规培生58名,实习生12名,进修生36名)进行腹腔镜操作培训。采用随机数字表法将学员分为两组。进行人工神经网络腹腔镜模拟器培训的学员设为人工神经网络组;进行箱式腹腔镜模拟器培训的学员设为普通腹腔镜模拟器组。两组学员利用各组的模拟器,接受10 h(为期5 d的连续训练,每天训练时长为2 h)培训,培训内容为腹腔镜手术基本技能。观察指标:(1)两组学员培训前后腹腔镜模拟器操作成绩比较。(2)两组学员培训后腹腔镜模拟器操作成绩提高程度比较。正态分布的计量资料以±s表示,组内比较采用配对t检验,组间比较采用独立样本t检验。偏态分布的计量资料以M(范围)表示。
    结果:筛选出符合条件的学员158名,男140例、女18例;中位年龄为27岁,年龄范围为20~ 34岁。158名学员中,人工神经网络组79名;普通腹腔镜模拟器组79名。(1)两组学员培训前后腹腔镜模拟器操作成绩比较:人工神经网络组学员培训前钉子转移、图案切割、结扎、体内缝合打结、体外缝合打结分别为(51.2±4.9)分、(45.6±3.7)分、(43.0±3.6)分、(42.1±3.1)分、(39.6±3.1)分,学员培训后上述指标分别为(78.6±3.0)分、(76.4±3.9)分、(79.9±2.5)分、(78.3±3.5)分、(84.1±3.8)分,学员培训前后上述指标比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=-42.490,-56.256,-80.373,-70.802,-79.742,P<0.05)。普通腹腔镜模拟器组学员培训前上述指标分别为(50.1±2.9)分、(45.4±3.9)分、(42.7±3.0)分、(42.3±3.4)分、(39.2±4.7)分,学员培训后上述指标分别为(70.4±5.0)分、(69.8±4.0)分、(72.3±3.3)分、(72.3±3.5)分、(72.8±3.2)分,学员培训前后上述指标比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=-28.942,-42.436,-58.357, -52.322,-53.098,P<0.05)。(2)两组学员培训后腹腔镜模拟器成绩提高程度比较:人工神经网络组学员培训后钉子转移、图案切割、结扎、体内缝合打结、体外缝合打结操作成绩提高程度分别为(27.4± 5.7)分、(30.8±5.0)分、(36.9±4.1)分、(36.2±4.5)分、(39.5±5.4)分,普通腹腔镜模拟器组学员培训后上述指标分别为(20.3±6.2)分、(24.4±5.1)分、(29.6±4.5)分、(29.9±5.1)分、(33.5±5.6)分,两组学员上述指标比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=7.597,7.946,10.638,8.200,6.969,P<0.05)。
    结论:腹腔镜操作培训中引入人工神经网络可以提高培训效果。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To investigate the application value of artificial neural network in laparoscopic surgery training.
    Methods:The prospective cohort study was conducted. A total of 158 trainees from the First Hospital Affiliated to Army Medical University between Semptember and November, 2019 who had no experience in laparoscopic technology were selected for laparoscopic surgery training, including 52 graduate students of surgery from grade 2019, 2018 and 2017, 58 surgeons receiving standardized residency training, 12 interns and 36 refresher physicians. The 158 trainees were divided into two groups using the random number table. Trainees trained by artificial neural network laparoscopic simulator were allocated into artificial neural network group, and trainees trained by box laparoscopic simulator were allocated into general laparoscopic simulator group. Trainees in both groups were trained using the laparoscopic simulator for 10 hours (5-day continuous training, 2 hours per day) on fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. Observation indicators: (1) comparison of operation grades on laparoscopic simulator before and after training in the two groups; (2) comparison of improvement of the operation grades on laparoscopic simulator after training between the two groups. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean±SD, comparison within groups was analyzed using the paired t test and comparison between groups was analyzed using the independent sample t test. Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M (range).
    Results:A total of 158 trainees were selected for eligibility, including 140 males and 18 females, aged from 23 to 34 years, with a median age of 27 years. Of the 158 trainees, 79 were in the artificial neural network group and 79 were in the general laparoscopic simulator group. (1) Comparison of operation grades on laparoscopic simulator before and after training in the two groups: operation grades of the nails transferring, pattern cutting, ligation, sewing knots in vivo and sewing knots in vitro for the artificial neural network group before training were 51.2±4.9, 45.6±3.7, 43.0±3.6, 42.1±3.1, and 39.6±3.1, respectively. The above indicators for the artificial neural network group after training were 78.6±3.0, 76.4±3.9, 79.9±2.5, 78.3±3.5, and 84.1±3.8, respectively. There were significant differences in the above indicators for the artificial neural network group before and after training (t=-42.490, -56.256, -80.373, -70.802, -79.742, P<0.05). The above indicators for the general laparoscopic simulator group before training were 50.1±2.9, 45.4±3.9, 42.7±3.0, 42.3±3.4, and 39.2±4.7, respectively. The above indicators for the general laparoscopic simulator group after training were 70.4±5.0, 69.8±4.0, 72.3±3.3, 72.3±3.5, and 72.8±3.2, respectively. There were significant differences in the above indicators for the general laparoscopic simulator group before and after training (t=-28.942, -42.436, -58.357, -52.322, -53.098, P<0.05). (2) Comparison of improvement of the operation grades on laparoscopic simulator after training between the two groups: improvement of the operation grades in the nails transferring, pattern cutting, ligation, sewing knots in vivo and sewing knots in vitro for the artificial neural network group after training were 27.4±5.7, 30.8±5.0, 36.9±4.1, 36.2±4.5 and 39.5±5.4, respectively. The above indicators for the general laparoscopic simulator group after training were 20.3±6.2, 24.4±5.1, 29.6±4.5, 29.9±5.1 and 33.5±5.6, respectively. There were significant differences in the above indicators between the two groups (t=7.597, 7.946, 10.638, 8.200, 6.969, P<0.05).
    Conclusion:The introduction of artificial neural network in laparoscopic surgery training can improve the training effects.

     

/

返回文章
返回